• Google
     
  • |
  • Advocacy & Safety
  • |
  • Bicycle Mechanics
  • |
  • BMX
  • |
  • Classic&Vintage
  • |
  • Commuting
  • |
  • General Cycling
  • |
  • Mountain Biking
  • |
  • Road Cycling
  • |
  • Touring
  • |
  • Tokyo Cycling Club
  • 27 vs 700c
    By:admin
    I have an older road bike with 27" wheels ... I'm wondering, why did the road bike world move to 700c? Is it more efficient, or does it stay true better, or what?

    Thanks!
    (锕侊箒)~~~~----------------------------------------------------------------------
    It's metric.

    The U.K. and the U.S. were the only countries using inches. Now the U.K. is using metric measurement. There was no reason to continue manufacturing wheels in different sizes for different markets, and it probably saves the manufacturers money throughout the industry to have one standard size.
    (锕侊箒)~~~~----------------------------------------------------------------------
    quote:and it probably saves the manufacturers money throughout the industry to have one standard size...yeah, but if there's one thing the bike tire industry DOESN'T have, it's standardization. Check out Sheldon Brown's site about tire sizes, it's mind-bogling. Anyhow, ranting aside, another big reason is that the 700C clincher is (supposed to be) the same diameter as the standard sewup/tubular. Big benefit for both the bike builders and especially for racers since you could easily swap one for the other and leave the brakes as they were...say, if you wanted to train on clinchers but race on tubs. And the first lightweight clinchers were French products (Module E and Rigida) so they were certainly going to make them metric, metric IS French.
    (锕侊箒)~~~~----------------------------------------------------------------------
    Quote Originally Posted by unworthy1 quote:and it probably saves the manufacturers money throughout the industry to have one standard size...yeah, but if there's one thing the bike tire industry DOESN'T have, it's standardization. Check out Sheldon Brown's site about tire sizes, it's mind-bogling. I know. However, the vast majority of bikes come in two flavors: 700c, and 26". Now, let's take one manufacturer making one model. Let's say the ACME GoFast. Instead of making some bikes for the American market, with cantilever posts set at 27", and some bikes for the European market, with cantilever posts set at 700c, ACME makes all bikes the same. ACME only has to make one bike (albeit in different frame sizes), and can sell that bike anywhere in the world. That results in lower costs for ACME.

    Anyhow, ranting aside, another big reason is that the 700C clincher is (supposed to be) the same diameter as the standard sewup/tubular. Big benefit for both the bike builders and especially for racers since you could easily swap one for the other and leave the brakes as they were...say, if you wanted to train on clinchers but race on tubs. And the first lightweight clinchers were French products (Module E and Rigida) so they were certainly going to make them metric, metric IS French. See what I mean? Standardization results in benefits for both the manufacturers and consumers.
    (锕侊箒)~~~~----------------------------------------------------------------------
    Quote Originally Posted by Blue Order It's metric.

    The U.K. and the U.S. were the only countries using inches. Now the U.K. is using metric measurement. There was no reason to continue manufacturing wheels in different sizes for different markets, and it probably saves the manufacturers money throughout the industry to have one standard size. True, but to me the ultimate irony is that the one surviving bottom bracket standard is 1-3/8" x 24 TPI. The Swiss standard made the most sense by far, being a purely metric 35x1mm, with a self-tightening left-threaded fixed cup, but it's the rarest of all. Go figure ...
    (锕侊箒)~~~~----------------------------------------------------------------------
    Quote Originally Posted by lukathonic why did the road bike world move to 700c? Actually, it didn't. The "road bike world" was using that size since the 19th century. Dunlop introduced the 630 mm (27 inch) size sometime in the 1950s for marketing reasons, but it never caught on outside of English speaking countries, and in the 1980s it was pretty much abandoned.

    Quote Originally Posted by Blue Order There was no reason to continue manufacturing wheels in different sizes for different markets, and it probably saves the manufacturers money throughout the industry to have one standard size. Right.

    Sheldon "Does Anybody Else Have A Rambouillet With 630 (27 inch) Wheels?" Brown
    Code:
     ------------------------------------------------ 
    
    |   I thought of that while riding my bicycle.   |
    
    |                            --Albert Einstein   |
    
     ------------------------------------------------ 
  • Got a fright !
    Yesterday morning I left home at 6 am driving my car to where I swim. This involves about 5 km on the freeway....
    tire help
    i just bought some vittoria action team HSD fold tires and as the name suggests they came folded. i unfolded t...
    BENDIX... color striped
    can some body please explain the differences in their... yellow, red and blue stripes including the various nu...
  • Does anyone have the Mar
    I'm looking for a 700x35 size but can't find anyone who seems to have them in stock Do you guys have any ideas...
    bikes...of course
    hello all i am currently living abroad in Grenoble, France and loving it. i sold my old bike (Giant OCR3) in o...
    trek 520 and sti questio
    Hello, I have a trek 520['06]. LX rr/der, 105 fr/der with 52/42/30 crankset. I hope to upgrade to sti levers. ...
  • Home
  • |
  • Advocacy & Safety
  • |
  • Bicycle Mechanics
  • |
  • BMX
  • |
  • Classic&Vintage
  • |
  • Commuting
  • |
  • General Cycling
  • |
  • Mountain Biking
  • |
  • Road Cycling
  • |
  • Touring
  • |
  • Tokyo Cycling Club
  • |
  • Term | Privacy | Contact
Copyright © 2007-2009 Bike Club, all rights reserved